Follow
Donate to HeyBucket.com - Amount:

Welcome Anonymous !

Your Fastpitch Softball Bible
 

Fastpitch Discussions

Male Coaches in College Sofbtall

What's on your mind?

by C77fastpitch » Thu Sep 13, 2018 6:43 am

You might want refer to a little thing called the Constitution of the United States. Title 9 of the Education Amendment Act of 1972 is a federal law that states: No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation, in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. Reed v. Reed It has been clearly understood that the 14th Amendment prohibits discrimination based on sex. The government shall not deny "any person" the equal protection under the law. I hope that helps.
C77fastpitch
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 6:51 pm

by C77fastpitch » Thu Sep 13, 2018 6:58 am

Skarp-As the world turns- You two gentlemen, and I use that term lightly, are really full of vicious rhetoric. Your disgusting post are going over the edge. My advice is to erase both post.
C77fastpitch
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 6:51 pm

by Skarp » Thu Sep 13, 2018 7:43 pm

C77fastpitch wrote:Skarp-As the world turns- You two gentlemen, and I use that term lightly, are really full of vicious rhetoric. Your disgusting post are going over the edge. My advice is to erase both post.

When you say vicious rhetoric, do you mean like when I called you a liar, liar? Or rather, liar, do you mean when I called you an ogre, or a shrill, hectoring harpy? Or was it something else?

Perfectly happy to defend all of the above, but it would be helpful if you could narrow it down for me. Oh and yeah, only liars like you need to go back and constantly delete what they write. My posts stay put.
There is no charge for awesomeness
...or attractiveness.
User avatar
Skarp
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:10 pm

by C77fastpitch » Fri Sep 14, 2018 3:15 am

Skarp- Here is something you might want to look at- California Penal Code 653.2 Dealing with aggressive internet language. I don't like or respect you in anyway, and don't think you're clever or funny. You lack even average intelligence, why would you think that editing has anything to do with honesty. Your posts are absolutely senseless, rambling torrents of stupidity. Your a show off to others on this forum that agree with you. Trying hard to convince them that you're a brave warrior of your agreed idiotic agenda. However, we know differently don't we Skarp, your actually gutless, a class A coward. You don't have $5000, your pathetic.
Last edited by C77fastpitch on Fri Sep 14, 2018 5:16 am, edited 8 times in total.
C77fastpitch
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 6:51 pm

by Skarp » Fri Sep 14, 2018 4:54 am

C77fastpitch wrote:Skarp- You are so utterly stupid and think you are so smart. Your a classic cyber jerk, and a little sissy butt. What does the fact that I edit have to do with lying, lord your dumb, you gutless nerd. I just called you a cry baby, sissy, gutless nerd. So what ya going to do Willis. CRY!

What am I going to do? Hard to say off-hand. There's a virtual cornucopia of options, so settling on a specific response isn't easy. But no, crying isn't on the menu.

How about this instead: since you and I both know that you are a mendacious piece of human detritus (i.e., a LIAR), I will hereby offer to pay you $5,000 if you can verify the truth of the claims you have made on this site about yourself and your beta hubby "Jeff". As a brief synopsis, you are both attorneys, and he played DE for both Notre Dame and the New York Jets--among a variety of other dubious claims you have made.

If the claims you have made on this site are true, prove it, and I've got $5K for you--sworn in front of God and everyone else here. (Doesn't have to be public--a mutually acceptable escrow is fine with me). With one itty-bitty proviso. Since you've taken every opportunity to point out that I'm "so utterly stupid and think [I'm] so smart," we'll add just one minor condition: if everything else you have said here proves to be true, and if either you or "Jeff" can produce a documented LSAT score higher than the LSAT score that I can produce, I'll give you another 3-1 on the $5k--for a total of $20k. If neither one of you can produce such a score, you get nothing.

That's an easy $20k I'm offering you for nothing more than proving you aren't completely full of shit. I can only assume that you will jump at this opportunity.
There is no charge for awesomeness
...or attractiveness.
User avatar
Skarp
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:10 pm

by Skarp » Fri Sep 14, 2018 5:06 am

C77fastpitch wrote:Skarp- Here is something you might want to look at- California Penal Code 653.2 Dealing with aggressive internet language.

Haha!...you mean like where my 6'6" husband started threatening physical violence? Or when I attacked you without provocation or any prior interactions in order to shut down your right to free speech and the expression of your opinions? Oh wait...

And I notice you once again went back and deleted a bunch of your own vile and "aggressive internet language." That's okay--I saved it for you.

If you want to set yourself up as the thought and speech police, choose some softer targets next time. This crowd has zero use for a witless harpy like you.
There is no charge for awesomeness
...or attractiveness.
User avatar
Skarp
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:10 pm

by Skarp » Fri Sep 14, 2018 6:29 am

C77fastpitch wrote:Skarp- Here is something you might want to look at- California Penal Code 653.2 Dealing with aggressive internet language. I don't like or respect you in anyway, and don't think you're clever or funny. You lack even average intelligence, why would you think that editing has anything to do with honesty. Your posts are absolutely senseless, rambling torrents of stupidity. Your a show off to others on this forum that agree with you. Trying hard to convince them that you're a brave warrior of your agreed idiotic agenda. However, we know differently don't we Skarp, your actually gutless, a class A coward. You don't have $5000, your pathetic.

Now you are editing your own posts to respond to other posts that came later in the thread? Congratulations...that's actually something I hadn't seen before.
There is no charge for awesomeness
...or attractiveness.
User avatar
Skarp
Premium Member
Premium Member
 
Posts: 3141
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:10 pm

by C77fastpitch » Sat Sep 15, 2018 4:16 am

Skarp- You are a gutless imbecilic moron. You like my edits dimwit?
C77fastpitch
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 6:51 pm

by Dugout Dad » Sat Sep 15, 2018 11:59 am

C77fastpitch wrote:Skarp- You are a gutless imbecilic moron. You like my edits dimwit?


Holy smokes, just caught up on this thread :lol: :roll:

A classic Heybucket neener-neener.

I would love to be a fly on the wall when 77 goes to the internet po-po and finds out that she is actually the guilty party of threatening violence and homophobic innuendo.

Wiktionary:
Interjection. neener. A childish, hostile taunt, often repeated in a singsong voice.
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.
Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill (1874-1965)

You can understand capitalism when you realize that Thomas Edison improved the world more than Karl Marx
Me
User avatar
Dugout Dad
 
Posts: 2334
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:46 pm

by GIMNEPIWO » Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:53 am

Dugout Dad wrote:
C77fastpitch wrote:Skarp- You are a gutless imbecilic moron. You like my edits dimwit?


Holy smokes, just caught up on this thread :lol: :roll:

A classic Heybucket neener-neener.

I would love to be a fly on the wall when 77 goes to the internet po-po and finds out that she is actually the guilty party of threatening violence and homophobic innuendo.

Wiktionary:
Interjection. neener. A childish, hostile taunt, often repeated in a singsong voice.


I was thinking it was more of a "Nanny Nanny Boo Boo, stick your head in Doo Doo"

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/na-na_na-na_boo-boo
"For the strength of the pack is the wolf, the strength of the wolf is the pack" Rudyard Kipling
User avatar
GIMNEPIWO
 
Posts: 4339
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:58 am
Location: Between Rock & Hard Place

PreviousNext

Return to Fastpitch Discussions